Thanks to @speranzom for contribution of the translations of the Kasai through attorney Shishikado parts of my translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 3/29 (Sunday).
- Maho’s Instastory
- Rena’s tweet
- Rena’s Instastory Q&A
- Tweet from beautician AidaMAN with Maho, Rena, and Riko
- NGT wota: “The children fans and the youth fans of NGT have decreased”
- Kasai on his Tweetcast: “On the room on the other side [from Maho’s] there was a *padlock* attached so Yamaguchi-san must have noticed [Tano] had moved out”
- Takkentaro: “Padlocks aren’t something attached on the doors in ordinary buildings”
- Inside story about the media scrum after the last trial session
- Attorney Shishikado’s blog: “On the true substance of the peaceful settlement (Taking the NGT trial as subject matter)”
- https://sskdlawyer.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/03/29/202040
- While I can’t draw a conclusion just yet, about the debate they’re having on whether or not to report in explicit terms about the facts of the aggression, could it be that the courthouse has shown them an outlook that, with things like this, the assessment on the facts about the incident would be a sticky matter?
- That is to say, the outlook for the moment on part of the courthouse looks not at all pretty.
- Since they have brought the matter on for this long while speaking of elucidating on the truth, it’s hard to understand how they would they then make the content of the peaceful settlement all secret, under the all-encompassing Non-Disclosure Clause.
- There’s a desire to set an exception from the general rule somehow (i.e. AKS releasing publicly what details they can, within what they find comfortable)
- However, with the defendants contesting the plaintiff’s argument about the state of the aggression, they are against making the matter of the aggression one of the essential clauses for the settlement and expressly putting it down into writing.
- Isn’t that certain declaration saying, “That’s a difficult part. We are still in the middle of the negotiations. It looks that there was an aggression. But we don’t find it good to express categorically that ‘there was’, in the settlement proposal”, something that came out while right in this cornered situation?
- Takken Taro videos
- “NGT — Consideration of the contents of the rotten AKS lawsuit settlement”
- “NGT’s “rotten settlement” — The reasons AKS was defeated by Yamaguchi Maho”
- Rena’s Instastory
- (女子野球の輪) [A chain of women baseballers] From Kataoka Ayumi to Inamura Ami, then from Inamura to Hasegawa Rena
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
Why is this here? My original announcement
0 Comments