My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 11/21 (Thursday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
Source
614： LillyRush ：2019/11/21(木) 21:25:20 ★１１月２１日（木） ・スポーツ報知で山口真帆の記事 ▽山口真帆、ゆったりニットのオフショットが反響「めっちゃ美脚」「キュンと来る」 https://hochi.news/articles/20191121-OHT1T50061.html ・【続き３】笠井北川が提出した準備書面と陳述書を閲覧に行った人のツイート https://i.imgur.com/Smgz3Ak.png ▽契約書について閲覧制限がかかっているのでは？という意見について https://i.imgur.com/lynzHV0.png ▽笠井は山口さんとの繋がりを口外していないという吐き気がする主張 https://i.imgur.com/hIR8CCV.png ▽第三者委員会の描写を否定する主張 https://i.imgur.com/xY31IUQ.png https://i.imgur.com/718EmHm.jpg https://www.weekly-monthly.net/search/shousai.html?bukken_no=59367 ・弁護士がNGT裁判の報道について語る ▽弁護士 師子角允彬のブログ：司法記者の倫理（ＮＧＴ裁判の報道の在り方） https://sskdlawyer.hatenablog.com/entry/2019/11/21/012626 ▽被告側が提出しようとしている 「写真会で撮影された写真」 ①「向かいの部屋の賃貸借契約書」 ②「衣類やアクセサリーを送ったり渡したりしていたとする陳述書」 ③「高級服やアクセサリーの購入明細書」 ④「高額プレゼントの運送記録」 や、こういった主張・立証活動は殆ど意味がない ▽重要なのは「ファン男性２名による暴行⇒山口氏による事件の公表⇒劇場公演やツアーの中止・広告打ち切り・自宅警備費用の増加」という一連の流れ ▽「ファン男性２名による暴行」（加害行為）の事実の存否と、劇場公演の中止等の損害が加害行為から生じた損害と認められるかどうかが本件の裁判の本質 ▽顔見知りであるかどうかは関係ない ▽陳述書は「当事者の一方的な認識が書かれた文書」以上の意味を持たない ▽①③④は被告側が一方的につながりを持とうとしていた以上の意味は持たない ▽②が真実かどうかは、山口さん側の言い分と突き合わせて検討しないと分からない 【隠し玉という表現について】 ▽重要書証は後出しジャンケン的に出しても「今更そんなもの出されても、提出は認められません」と、取調べをしてもらえないことがある ▽だから重要書証は訴訟が進行すればするほど出なくなるのが普通 ▽裁判では「乞うご期待」みたいなことは普通生じない ▽初期段階に最もインパクトの強いやり取りがなされて、だんだん収束していく 【山口さんの証人尋問について】 ▽証人尋問は当事者が証人尋問の申出をしなければ実施されない ▽繋がりがないなら、被告側はウソがバレるので証人尋問の申し出はしない ▽山口さんとＡＫＳとの関係は必ずしも良好ではないので、ＡＫＳが山口さんの証人尋問を求めるかも不透明 ▽そういう状況の中で「真実」らしきものが議論されて、それが面白おかしく報道されることが問題なのに、証人として出廷しろと煽るのは酷 615： LillyRush ：2019/11/21(木) 22:47:19 ★１１月２１日（木）【追加】 ・２３日（土）の菅原りこSRの配信時刻が夜８時に決定 https://i.imgur.com/fKUc2RJ.png https://i.imgur.com/gblu6rE.jpg https://i.imgur.com/xg0O1sT.jpg ・長谷川玲奈インスタ＆ツイート https://i.imgur.com/fO57ZXv.jpg https://i.imgur.com/vKhWi9H.jpg https://i.imgur.com/VIlQQVc.jpg 616： LillyRush ：2019/11/22(金) 00:03:06 ★１１月２１日（木）【追加２】 ・山口真帆インスタ＆ストーリー https://i.imgur.com/dN6QYxD.jpg https://i.imgur.com/88vVFZE.jpg https://i.imgur.com/8Ss776A.jpg https://i.imgur.com/oLoDCaF.jpg ・長谷川玲奈ツイート https://i.imgur.com/Enr8qrC.png https://i.imgur.com/qJ42mSj.jpg https://i.imgur.com/gU3l2Ba.jpg https://i.imgur.com/fgSQSSt.jpg
- An article on Maho in Sports Hochi
- From Sports Hochi: “Reactions to Yamaguchi Maho’s relaxed knit off-shots — “incredibly beautiful legs”, “lovestruck””
- Tweets from someone who went to read the preparatory papers and statements submitted by Kasai and Kitagawa (4th part)
- https://i.imgur.com/Smgz3Ak.png
- My opinion on: Is there some restriction on viewing the contract?
- Kasai’s claim that he wouldn’t reveal his connections to Maho are sickening
- Their claims dispute the representations of the third party committee report
- https://i.imgur.com/718EmHm.jpg
- https://www.weekly-monthly.net/search/shousai.html?bukken_no=59367
- A lawyer discusses information on the NGT trial
- “Attorney Shishikado Nobuaki’s Blog: Ethics of judicial reporters (How the NGT trial aught to be reported)”
- Regarding what it seems the defense submitted
- “The photos taken at the photo event”,
(1) “The rental agreement for the room across the hall”,
(2) “A statement that he sent and handed over clothes and accessories”,
(3) “Purchase receipts for high-class clothes and accessories”,
(4) “Shipping documents for valuable goods”,
etc., and as far as evidence of their actions these claims are essentially meaningless. - The essential sequence of events is: “Assault by two male fans ⇒ Maho makes the incident public ⇒ the theater shows and tours are suspended, advertising is discontinued, and personal security costs increase”.
- The essence of this trial is the truth of the “assault by two male fans” (the act of assault) and whether it’s recognized that this act of assault resulted in damages from the suspension of the theater shows, etc.
- It doesn’t matter whether they were acquainted or not
- The written statement carries no more meaning than, “a document written under the unilateral cognizance of an interested party”.
- (1), (3), and (4) have no significance beyond the defense unilaterally saying there was a connection.
- As to whether (2) is true, I don’t know if Yamaguchi’s side will make their case and conduct a cross-examination or not.
- “The photos taken at the photo event”,
- (Regarding the expression of having a trick up their sleeve)
- Waiting to reveal important evidence is like cheating in rock-paper-scissors, as in “even if they were able to produce something, at this point it wouldn’t be admissible”; there are things your not able to ask to be done in an investigation.
- Thus normally important documents can’t be made to appear as the litigation progresses.
- In a trial things like, “stay tuned for more” usually don’t happen.
- A strong exchange in the initial stages will have the most impact, and then gradually things will converge.
- (Regarding Yamaguchi’s cross-examination as a witness)
- Her cross-examination can’t happen unless a concerned party submits a witness examination request.
- If there was no connection, the defense won’t request cross-examination as their lies will be exposed.
- As the relationship between AKS and Yamaguchi has not always been favorable, it’s not clear that AKS will request Yamaguchi’s questioning.
- So in the midst of such a situation, when what the “truth” seems to be is disputed, and yet is reported on in a laughable manner, to appear in court as witness would be harsh.
- Riko’s live Showroom on the 23rd (Saturday) will be at 8pm
- Rena’s Instagram and tweet
- Maho’s Instagram and Instastory
- Rena’s tweet
0 Comments