My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 2/6 (Thursday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
- Riko’s tweet
- Takazawa Tomoka’s Instagram
- Takazawa Tomoka’s radio appearance
- https://i.imgur.com/FSZv0rS.png
- Part where Takazawa appears
- Attorney Shishikado’s blog: “Defamation Cases — Reporting of quotations and a private person’s rights”
- https://sskdlawyer.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/02/05/215119
- https://i.imgur.com/PGdsxvx.png
- When you have articles that factually assert things like, “They received the address from Yamaguchi”, the assertion that this is a fact lowers Yamaguchi’s social standing, and thus it likely constitutes defamation.
- In the case that it’s true, and Yamaguchi has swallowed so many people up in some kind of game, it’s quite likely she’ll face backlash from society.
- When the author or poster of such an article is sued by Yamaguchi for defamation, they won’t escape responsibility unless they can prove Yamaguchi told them [the defendants] the address.
- I wonder if there’s some purpose in reporting the defendants’ claims as they have been so far?
- In particular I have doubts about how reasonable it is to publish an article that has the testimony of the defendants, or that quotes their claims, with a headline that misleadingly invites you to think the defense may have some rational basis for their claims.
Why is this here? My original announcement
0 Comments