My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 2/6 (Thursday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
Source
777： LillyRush ：2020/02/06(木) 20:57:43 ★２月６日（木） ・菅原りこツイート https://i.imgur.com/84YbGkN.jpg https://twi○tter.com/riko__sakuranbo/status/1225071805070626821 ・高沢朋花インスタ https://i.imgur.com/KwJrV4i.jpg https://i.imgur.com/EJ6TTPP.jpg ・高沢朋花ラジオ出演 https://i.imgur.com/FSZv0rS.png 高沢出演部分 http://xxup.org/XBt1o.mp3 ・師子角弁護士のブログ：名誉毀損事件 引用報道と個人の人権（ＮＧＴ裁判） https://sskdlawyer.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/02/05/215119 https://i.imgur.com/PGdsxvx.png ▽記事にある「住所は山口に教えてもらった」などの事実主張は、山口氏の社会的評価を下げる事実の摘示として、名誉毀損に該当する可能性がある ▽それが真実であるならば、山口氏は狂言で多くの人を巻き込んだとして、社会的な非難を受けかねないからです ▽記事の執筆者・掲載者は山口氏から名誉毀損で訴えられた時に、住所を山口氏が教えたことなどを立証しなければ免責されないことになってしまう ▽そうまでして被告の主張を報じる意味はあるのだろうか ▽被告側の主張に合理的根拠があるかのようなミスリードを誘う見出しを付けてまで被告の供述・主張を引用する記事を掲載することに、どれだけの合理性があるのか疑問
- Riko’s tweet
- Takazawa Tomoka’s Instagram
- Takazawa Tomoka’s radio appearance
- https://i.imgur.com/FSZv0rS.png
- Part where Takazawa appears
- Attorney Shishikado’s blog: “Defamation Cases — Reporting of quotations and a private person’s rights”
- https://sskdlawyer.hatenablog.com/entry/2020/02/05/215119
- https://i.imgur.com/PGdsxvx.png
- When you have articles that factually assert things like, “They received the address from Yamaguchi”, the assertion that this is a fact lowers Yamaguchi’s social standing, and thus it likely constitutes defamation.
- In the case that it’s true, and Yamaguchi has swallowed so many people up in some kind of game, it’s quite likely she’ll face backlash from society.
- When the author or poster of such an article is sued by Yamaguchi for defamation, they won’t escape responsibility unless they can prove Yamaguchi told them [the defendants] the address.
- I wonder if there’s some purpose in reporting the defendants’ claims as they have been so far?
- In particular I have doubts about how reasonable it is to publish an article that has the testimony of the defendants, or that quotes their claims, with a headline that misleadingly invites you to think the defense may have some rational basis for their claims.
Why is this here? My original announcement
0 Comments