My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 12/29 (Sunday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
- Riko’s tweet
- Rena’s tweet and Instastory
- Looking back over the past year, discussion of NGT kenkyuusei Takahashi Nanami getting support from Watanabe Ayusa for her Showroom event.
- Ryuta continues to be upset and shows no remorse since deleting all his tweets after a warning from Twitter.
- Takken Taro video: “NGT — Bad news for Yoshinari (3) AKS attorneys refute “Defendant 2 was pulled aside”!”
- Takken Taro video: “NGT — Bad news for Yoshinari (2) AKS attorney refutes the “I didn’t grab her face”!”
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MZh7ILWR-o
- (There is no reason for someone to ever perform such a violation)
- This sentence particularly caught me, is there any “reason to perform such a violation” in the first place?
- Generally the people caught doing such violations or molesting are usually people that are unable to suppress or control their own urges, though you don’t often see an attempt at an explanation like, “No, actually I had a reason to violate her. For this and that various reasons I felt that I had to violate her”.
- But isn’t it not usually some feeling like, “There’s no reason…”?
- I haven’t agreed from the start with the “they went and pinned her forehead theory”
- I guess isn’t as the AKS attorneys say, so she didn’t raise her voice, “they went and grabbed her mouth”.
- I wonder if they didn’t go to grab her mouth, and in the course of the act their hand slipped up her face.
- As Yamaguchi said, maybe though they grabbed her forehead, they hadn’t intended to grab it, and being afraid of her shouting and had gone to grab her mouth and slipped.
– - (Yamaguchi: “It was my face not the door”)
(Defendant 1: “Really in truth I wasn’t trying to push my way in, it wasn’t anything like that”)- It’s clear isn’t it, right here Defendant 1 isn’t denying that he grabbed her face, right?
- (Yamaguchi: “Why’d you do something like that if you weren’t trying to push your way in?”)
- It seems to me like, weren’t they trying to push their way in?
- Going to visit at night in the first place, when she’s tired and on her way home from work, the act of going to visit her home, in and of itself, is I think an act of stalking.
- And in particular going to visit, especially when you’re renting the room right in front of hers, doesn’t really seem necessary, right?
- When any of you are going to see someone, well then it’s not likely you’d go and rent the room across from them, right? There’s no need to rent the room across from them.
- They said weird things like wanting to move to room 314 since renting a room on the 6th floor was too expensive. Well that’s because that’s a lie. It wouldn’t be cheaper at all.
- Of course normally you would think you wouldn’t have rented it for the purpose of going to visit Yamaguchi.
- There was no need to rent the room across from hers, and there was no need to jump out just at the time that she was returning home.
- And in the worst case if Yamaguchi had gone into her room, you just needed to ring her doorbell, so if it seemed she was going in there’s no need to rush to stop her.
— - (Yamaguchi: “You didn’t say a word or even a single sound”)
(Defendant 1: “Well it’s because you were going in. I was going to open the door first and then try saying something”)- I can’t really understand this part either.
- If you’re trying to get in, then it’s fine to just ring the bell and say something.
- Why is there a need to stop her and push and pull? And in any case Defendant 1 has stated that he had a personal relationship and had received her cellphone number.
- A person he had made friends with and exchanged Twitter DMs, and is saying had a relationship such that they were suspicious and jealous of his connection with person “D”, if Yamaguchi had shut her door, wouldn’t you just ring to have it opened?
- Yeah, why the heck would you need to forcibly stop her?
- (Conclusions from that final “that’s all”)
- I fully approve of the AKS attorneys’ recognition regarding the assault incident.
- As for the AKS trial itself, though I suspect they’re colluding in the trial to scorn Yamaguchi, I think regarding their recognition of the assault incident they have exceedingly clear characterization and analysis.
- So that is to say the AKS attorneys’ claims are refuting the “There was no assault incident, there was no grabbing her face” claims of the defendants.
- So I think at the same time they are clearly refuting Yoshinari when she says, “There was nothing like an assault incident” and “Since it wasn’t prosecuted there was no criminal case”.
- https://i.imgur.com/CnGraHJ.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/BWNw4PT.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/0o6jaY7.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/yMh3SdF.jpg
0 Comments