A joint translation with @speranzom, who was generous enough to provide the Takken Taro part from the summary https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 11/27 (Wednesday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
- Maho’s Instastory and tweet
- Rena’s Instagram and Instastory
- Riko’s tweets
- The Tainai amazake is still selling well. A local Niigata alcohol shop, “quickly put in additional orders, but they already only have a few left”
- “Attorney Shishikado Nobuaki’s Blog: Wavering on the terms of the assault — Retreating from Yamaguchi’s statements (NGT trial)”
- For some reason AKB Newspaper’s Setsu Shinya’s presence is removed from the paper. He has one credited article but is not listed in the editorial section.
- Seems recently the AKB Cafe has been operating with the “AKB Cafe” part of it’s neon sign turned off.
- https://i.imgur.com/afMLXaa.jpg
- The sign previously
- Takken Taro: “NGT48 – The perpetrators admit it! “Yamaguchi-san was without any doubt caught in what is a crime””
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euZsk3a3h40
- In the statement paper of defendant #2 (Kitagawa), the following represents a problematic passage
- “(Miss Yamaguchi) thrusted into my the chest area to push me out in the direction of the common hallway”
- Everyone, did you notice something about this text?
- Defendant #2 says the following, “to push me out in the direction of the common hallway”
- By saying “she tried to push me out”, it means that at the time the position of defendant #2 was *not in the common hallway*
- In this case, if one wonders *from where* she was trying to push him out, in talking about pushing out into the hallway, it is obvious one can’t think of anything else but *inside of room #303 [Maho’s room]”
- It’s precisely because he was at the moment entering inside of room #303, that Yamaguchi-san was trying to push him out
- If he were actually standing in the common hallway since the beginning, there wouldn’t have be no need for him to push him away then.
- That is to say, this assailant is pretty much admitting in his own statement paper that he actually attempted to break into Yamaguchi-san’s apartment without consent and did indeed enter it.
- In other words, for what regards defendant #2, he does on his own volition come clean and admit: “I did commit the crime of unlawful trespassing”. In his own statement paper.
- That raises the doubt of whether their lawyer warned him against submitting that statement papers, or maybe if he didn’t check it at all beforehand.
- Defendant #2 clearly entered inside without permission, one can say he indeed barged inside.
- He tried to entered inside at any cost where someone didn’t want to no matter what, and she tried to push him out for it, after all.
- This is a criminal act. Very clearly one.
— - This time they got sent to the prosecutor and ended up in a non-prosecution, but the point of contention, or rather the point of issue is if what they got a non-prosecution for is the crime of unlawful trespassing in someone’s residence; if it’s for this crime that they were ruled without prosecution.
- If it meant that the act of unlawful trespassing was considered in it, and then received a non-prosecution, it would make it an incident that is dead and done.
- If what they received a non-prosecution for was relative to the assault incident, that means that they didn’t get a non-prosecution for the unlawful residence trespassing, which is to say it’s possible they may be *re-arrested* for it
- Anyway, speaking of the crime of unlawful residence trespassing, this *isn’t an offense that necessitates a voluntary complaint*, so even without a criminal complaint filed or a legal complaint, this is grounds enough for arrest anyway, even a third party can make a declaration on it.
- If anyone would look into this incident and it turns out that unlawful trespassing wasn’t filed it, they then can make a declaration on it. It’s not like they will go on trial themselves.
– - So, defendant #2, it means you are a criminal
- That is to say defendant #1 did bring along with himself a criminal.
- He may claim “I had no intention to commit an assault act”, or “I committed no assault”
but as I have also given a mention in the previous video, despite him claiming that he “moved in there because the rental fees for room #602 were expensive”, that was a lie, as I clearly explained
- He may claim “I had no intention to commit an assault act”, or “I committed no assault”
- Being the culprit is the kind of person to say such huge lies, I can’t help suspecting if an assault incident actually happened anyway, for what he says.
- Since defendant #2 admitted all by himself about the unlawful trespassing, defendant #1, who brought with himself someone who turned out to be a criminal, is a criminal too in the same way.
- That’s because this is something they committed in partnership. So, the feeling is that, you can’t fault someone for suspecting them of conspiracy, this way.
- Isn’t there also responsibility involved? Since the partner you brought along with yourself did end up committing what is a crime,
that’s a criminal offense too. And the one who gave the chance for this to happen is none else but defendant #1.
- President Yoshinari, you too, didn’t you say “Since it ended without prosecution, it means it’s not a criminal incident”. Well, he just admitted to it, the culprit himself. And that’s a criminal offense, mind you.
- https://i.imgur.com/whr5EIF.jpg
- Riko’s appearance on GunosyQ
- Takken Taro’s tweet: Regarding trespassing
- Eight months ago in a review of the NGT theater on Google Maps, Inaoka commented, “I’m not able to exert influence (over NGT) anymore”
0 Comments