My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 10/22 (Tuesday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
Source
538: LillyRush :2019/10/22(火) 20:46:11
★10月22日(火)
・山口真帆がヤングアニマルの巻頭グラビア&付録
https://i.imgur.com/MBZNVRX.png
・長谷川玲奈ツイート
https://i.imgur.com/phKEAKR.png
https://i.imgur.com/E3ydIuT.png
https://i.imgur.com/6D54a9H.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/CNtjCPZ.jpg
・宅建太郎:NGT48 記憶を頼りに準備書面(被告側)を復元「録音データ出さない」N0 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90ZwJjkTDqs
(※青い画像は訴状の引用)
▽アルファベットの「I」は1と紛らわしいから使わない
▽被告側の主張としては、暴行行為は無かったんだと言っている
▽痴漢の犯人が証拠がないことをいいことに、そんなことやってないと言ってるようなもの
▽被告らは原告AKSの訴状のかなりの部分を認めている
▽被告らが認めたのは「被告らの加害行為(青い画像)」という部分
襲われる前の、情報を聞き出した部分は認めている
▽ただし否定している部分があって、暴行事件は無かったんだ、顔を掴んではいないと言っている
▽暴行事件に関して共謀した事実もないと主張
▽暴行の事実はなかったという被告側の主張は相当怪しいと見ている。
なにもない状態で逮捕までされて、拘留期間いっぱいまで取り調べとはならない
▽警察は暴行の事実はあったと見ていたんじゃないか
▽ただ、あらかじめ共謀して、暴行するために行ったかどうかは別
▽「本件暴行があった後、山口氏はメンバーBに~」の訴状の部分
「暴行があった後」が前提に付いているので、被告側は暴行していないという主張なので、この部分を否定している
▽公園へ行ったところまでは原告も被告も一致している
▽この後、訴状ではバスが到着して中でやり取りしている
時系列が正しいならバスの中での会話が録音されている
▽被告の準備書面ではバスの中について何ら言及していない。否定してるわけではない。
「公園での会話が録音されていて」その録音媒体を出してきていないと言っている
https://i.imgur.com/Z12Y98I.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/UPeT2sQ.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/HClIqOo.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/P4hHUOj.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/W3kT3k9.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/do2FQQo.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/yXHejCw.jpg
・「嫌疑あり」で微罪処分したときのみ、日本の警察は送致しない
太野、西潟が送致されていないということは?
https://i.imgur.com/s2uicSS.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/LAObyTr.jpg
・今日の新潟日報
https://i.imgur.com/Lx6E091.jpg
539: LillyRush :2019/10/23(水) 00:27:13
★10月22日(火)【追加】
・山口真帆ツイート
https://i.imgur.com/qQVEXmq.png
・菅原りこツイート
https://i.imgur.com/96mdRRs.png
https://i.imgur.com/WzEGFMO.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/OyOcOHh.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/JZ8YW9R.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/DnZw5pU.jpg
・長谷川玲奈ストーリー
https://i.imgur.com/Rebedmb.jpg
・太野彩香 ストーリーで煽ってる?
https://i.imgur.com/4jHNeAW.jpg
540: LillyRush :2019/10/23(水) 01:11:51
★10月22日(火)【追加2】
・山口真帆ツイート
https://i.imgur.com/CSIWKyd.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/9HRyRDl.jpg
- Maho will have the opening gravure and supplement in Young Animal
- Rena’s tweets
- (Revised 3/29/2020 with contribution from @speranzom)
Takkentaro: “NGT48, Reconstructing the court’s preparatory papers (defendant side) with the help of memory, “Wouldn’t you present the voice recording data?” No. 1- (* The pictures in blue background are excerpts from the plaintiff’s original complaint)
- Since the alphabet notation “I” would get mistaken with a 1, they say they aren’t using it.
- Regarding the claim from the defendant’s side, they say that there was no assault act.
- That is, using to his advantage that there’s no evidence around, the criminal molester is telling that such a thing never happened in the first place
- The defendants are also agreeing to a sizable part of the lawsuit complaint of AKS, the plaintiff.
- One of the things the plaintiff acknowledged to is the part which says, “Harmful actions of the defendants (see picture with blue background)
- ”Here, they acknowledge the part about how they asked for information before [Maho] was ambushed
- But to be completely accurate, there is a part they are denying, saying that the assault incident didn’t occur, that they didn’t clutch her face.
- They also assert that there was no case of them conspiring together, in regards to the assault incident
- The assertion from the defendant side that there was no such case of aggression looks to me as rather questionable.
- In a condition where nothing did take place, you wouldn’t end up being arrested and undergoing investigation until the maximum extent of the police custody period
- Didn’t the police see how the case of aggression was real, if anything?
- But nonetheless, again, the question of whether they conspired together, whether or not they went there with the explicit purpose of committing an aggression is a separate issue
- About the part of the plaintiff’s lawsuit complaint going, “After said physical assault took place, Miss Yamaguchi contacted B, etc…”
- Since “After the physical assault” is attached to it as a premise, the defendants’ side is denying it, on the claim that they didn’t commit an physical assault.
- Up until the part about how they headed toward the public park, both the plaintiff and the defendants are of the same mind.
- Afterwards, in the plaintiff’s lawsuit complaint it goes on to say that the [staff’s] bus then arrived and they went on to have a conversation inside
- If the chronological order is right, then it would mean that the conversation inside the bus was recorded
- Now, in the defendant’s preparatory papers they make no kind of mention to them being inside of the bus. That doesn’t mean they are denying it, either.“
- Since the conversation at the public park was being recorded”, wouldn’t you present the recording? — they are instead saying.
- https://i.imgur.com/Z12Y98I.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/UPeT2sQ.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/HClIqOo.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/P4hHUOj.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/W3kT3k9.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/do2FQQo.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/yXHejCw.jpg
- Police in Japan will not bring you in merely for “suspicions” you committed a minor offense
- What does it mean that Tano and Nishigata have not been brought in?
- https://i.imgur.com/s2uicSS.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/LAObyTr.jpg
- Today’s Niigata Nippo
- Maho’s tweet
- Riko’s tweet
- Rena’s Instastory
- Tano provoking things in her Instastory?
- Maho’s tweet
0 Comments