My translation of the summary from https://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/music/29852/1553736787 for 10/22 (Tuesday).
Note: I try to repeat the Japanese thread as closely as possible here. Where I do make some editorial additions I’ll put them in [ ], though I do occasionally soften the posters’ tone.
- Maho will have the opening gravure and supplement in Young Animal
- Rena’s tweets
- (Revised 3/29/2020 with contribution from @speranzom)
Takkentaro: “NGT48, Reconstructing the court’s preparatory papers (defendant side) with the help of memory, “Wouldn’t you present the voice recording data?” No. 1- (* The pictures in blue background are excerpts from the plaintiff’s original complaint)
- Since the alphabet notation “I” would get mistaken with a 1, they say they aren’t using it.
- Regarding the claim from the defendant’s side, they say that there was no assault act.
- That is, using to his advantage that there’s no evidence around, the criminal molester is telling that such a thing never happened in the first place
- The defendants are also agreeing to a sizable part of the lawsuit complaint of AKS, the plaintiff.
- One of the things the plaintiff acknowledged to is the part which says, “Harmful actions of the defendants (see picture with blue background)
- ”Here, they acknowledge the part about how they asked for information before [Maho] was ambushed
- But to be completely accurate, there is a part they are denying, saying that the assault incident didn’t occur, that they didn’t clutch her face.
- They also assert that there was no case of them conspiring together, in regards to the assault incident
- The assertion from the defendant side that there was no such case of aggression looks to me as rather questionable.
- In a condition where nothing did take place, you wouldn’t end up being arrested and undergoing investigation until the maximum extent of the police custody period
- Didn’t the police see how the case of aggression was real, if anything?
- But nonetheless, again, the question of whether they conspired together, whether or not they went there with the explicit purpose of committing an aggression is a separate issue
- About the part of the plaintiff’s lawsuit complaint going, “After said physical assault took place, Miss Yamaguchi contacted B, etc…”
- Since “After the physical assault” is attached to it as a premise, the defendants’ side is denying it, on the claim that they didn’t commit an physical assault.
- Up until the part about how they headed toward the public park, both the plaintiff and the defendants are of the same mind.
- Afterwards, in the plaintiff’s lawsuit complaint it goes on to say that the [staff’s] bus then arrived and they went on to have a conversation inside
- If the chronological order is right, then it would mean that the conversation inside the bus was recorded
- Now, in the defendant’s preparatory papers they make no kind of mention to them being inside of the bus. That doesn’t mean they are denying it, either.“
- Since the conversation at the public park was being recorded”, wouldn’t you present the recording? — they are instead saying.
- https://i.imgur.com/Z12Y98I.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/UPeT2sQ.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/HClIqOo.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/P4hHUOj.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/W3kT3k9.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/do2FQQo.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/yXHejCw.jpg
- Police in Japan will not bring you in merely for “suspicions” you committed a minor offense
- What does it mean that Tano and Nishigata have not been brought in?
- https://i.imgur.com/s2uicSS.jpg
- https://i.imgur.com/LAObyTr.jpg
- Today’s Niigata Nippo
- Maho’s tweet
- Riko’s tweet
- Rena’s Instastory
- Tano provoking things in her Instastory?
- Maho’s tweet
0 Comments